| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Justo
Site Admin
Joined: 05 Dec 2008
Posts: 2701
Location: TEXAS
|
 Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:55 am Post subject: A politician rating sytem |
 |
|
73.1% of Politicians are Scum
George BushHenry WaxmanBob NeyTom DaschleTed StevensBarney FrankMitch McConnellHarry Reid
The vast majority of elected officials are dishonest, corrupt, unprincipled, self-indulgent abusers of the public’s trust. They are out of touch and out of control, with a singular focus on maintaining their careers in politics.
In Dictionary.com Unabridged, politicians are defined as those more concerned about winning favor or retaining power than about maintaining principles.
Politicians (i.e. scum) distract us with their frivolous game of “Democrats versus Republicans,” but the reality is their only goal is to obtain power and get control of your money.
Using your money, politicians (i.e. scum) have done the following:
1. Compiled debt and obligations in excess of $56,400,000,000,000, which represents $483,000 per household.
2. Lied to you about what they (i.e. scum) will do with your money.
3. Created an industry in which your money is taken, in the form of taxes, and redistributed to whatever institutions have given them (i.e. scum) the most donations or whomever will provide them (i.e. scum) the most votes.
4. Attempted to create an environment in which you no longer control your own destiny. Instead, you are dependent on them (i.e. scum) for handouts, rebates, and bailouts.
Stop treating politicians (i.e. scum) as if they have your best interests at heart. They (i.e. scum) do not. Remember, the scum-sucking maggots are employed by you.
You should demand better. http://73point1.com/
_________________
_________________
The Truth shall set you free... But first it will piss you off!
-Anon |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Justo
Site Admin
Joined: 05 Dec 2008
Posts: 2701
Location: TEXAS
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
http://raleigh.craigslist.org/pol/1553324220.html Wealthy societies always end up producing Liberals
Date: 2010-01-14, 10:07PM EST
Reply to: comm-bma8k-1553324220@craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]
Liberals only exist in wealthy societies. But they are not the ones who made their society wealthy, they are simply the product of a wealthy society.
Non-liberals are always the ones who make a society wealthy through hard work, ethics, self-preservation, and discipline. Then, once the country has achieved a certain threshold of wealth, it begins to breed liberalism. Liberalism is a wealthy society's equivalent of a spoiled, ungrateful child.
How many Liberals are there in Africa, for instance? Not many. Why? Because Africa is very poor. Poor countries don't breed Liberals, because poor countries are trying to become wealthy. To be a Liberal in a poor country would be totally ridiculous, because it would be counter-productive. It would be like trying to find a spoiled child who likes giving away all of his family's possessions and doesn't like to eat any vegetables living in the slums. Such a child wouldn't exist in the slums, just as Liberals don't exist in poor countries.
To become wealthy, a country must first have hard working, ethical people who are interested in helping their own kind and their own society. Liberals don't support their own kind or their own society. Liberals like to support outsiders and hand off their forefather's wealth to make themselves feel better.
Name one poor country full of Liberals. You can't, because Liberals are only bred in wealthy societies.
Name one country that became wealthy through liberalism. Again, you can't, because countries only become wealthy through conservative measures, then once they are wealthy, they breed Liberals.
_________________
The Truth shall set you free... But first it will piss you off!
-Anon |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Free Forum
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
